 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / December 2006Some nice Pentax lens work...
http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/index.html mike > http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/index.html > > mike Some interesting shots there, Mike. A question: why did you use a gamma of 1.8 for your images? That was an older Apple standard, all PC's use 2.2, and I believe the newer macs now use 2.2 also, as do digital cameras producing jpeg images. Viewing a gamma of 1.8 on a PC results in a darker-looking image. Colin D.  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/index.html >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Colin D. Thank you for the compliment, but those aren't my picture... blush.. mike > Some interesting shots there, Mike. A question: why did you use a gamma > of 1.8 for your images? That was an older Apple standard, all PC's use > 2.2, and I believe the newer macs now use 2.2 also, as do digital > cameras producing jpeg images. Viewing a gamma of 1.8 on a PC results > in a darker-looking image. 1. That ain't his site. 2. Pentax users are obviously still way behind the times. >> Some interesting shots there, Mike. A question: why did you use a gamma >> of 1.8 for your images? That was an older Apple standard, all PC's use [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 1. That ain't his site. > 2. Pentax users are obviously still way behind the times. Don't you have some butterflies that need their wings pulled off? you could call it MACRO MASOCHISTS LOVE THE 20D!! This should be easy for you after having nailed that poor bird. mike >> Some interesting shots there, Mike. A question: why did you use a gamma >> of 1.8 for your images? That was an older Apple standard, all PC's use [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > 1. That ain't his site. > 2. Pentax users are obviously still way behind the times. Ok. I would've thought he would say so. He gave no indication it wasn't his site, so I assumed ... Colin D. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > Ok. I would've thought he would say so. He gave no indication it > wasn't his site, so I assumed ... > > Colin D. At first glance it looked like a typical "look what I found" post. Nothin' but a URL. Usually if someone's touting their own work, they'll have a word or two to say in justification of their own ego. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.