 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / November 2006T-BIRDS LOVE THE 20D !
Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. A big bird! http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625082/original http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625084 > Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. > A big bird! > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625082/original > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625084 http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625082/original Bret, this shot of Spike is truly your best! Look at the detail of his feathers. The color is drop-dead gorgeous! Superb shot! Congrats! http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625084 I think I know what he is saying in this shot: "don't even THINK about it! Thanksgiving is for turkeys NOT blue heron"! LOL. Helen > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625082/original > Bret, this shot of Spike is truly your best! Look at the detail of his > feathers. The color is drop-dead gorgeous! Superb shot! Congrats! "Color? What is color?" -Daniel Rocha > Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. > A big bird! > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625082/original > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/70625084 Why do you persist in publicizing this stuff here? There *is* a rec.photo.equipment.digital group you know. > > Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. > > A big bird! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Why do you persist in publicizing this stuff here? There *is* a > rec.photo.equipment.digital group you know. Because she*) is clueless? CapsLock always seem to be stuck when writing headlines too. /Martin *) I assume OP is female, as "Annika" is a girls name much used in Sweden. But of course my assumption could be wrong. Martin S?rensen wrote: > > Why do you persist in publicizing this stuff here? There *is* a > > rec.photo.equipment.digital group you know. > > Because she*) is clueless? Yeah, I'm the one that's clueless. LOL! >CapsLock always seem to be stuck when writing headlines too. That's so that all my fans can easily find my posts. >> CapsLock always seem to be stuck when writing headlines too. > > That's so that all my fans can easily find my posts. We are such dedicated fans of Spike that we can even find his pics from command prompt. Keep em coming!!! Rita Your assumption is wrong, but close. HE's a big fan of Annika Sorenstam...  SignatureSkip Middleton www.shadowcatcherimagery.com www.pbase.com/skipm >> Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. >> A big bird! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Why do you persist in publicizing this stuff here? There *is* a > rec.photo.equipment.digital group you know. 'This stuff'? name anybody else whose images are consistently as good as Bret puts up - and he was posting here before the digital groups were a reality. There's the doers and the knockers. Where are your images? Colin D. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >>> Well it's Thanksgiving time and everyone knows what that means. >>> A big bird! [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Colin D. Yes. Bret's images are an inspiration.....Sometimes, when he posts a really spectacular one, I grab my camera and go out to see what I can get, even if it's pouring down rain....He has sold a hell of a lot of film to me, even though his images are digital in origin...... > 'This stuff'? name anybody else whose images are consistently as good > as Bret puts up - and he was posting here before the digital groups were > a reality. There's the doers and the knockers. Where are your images? Yeah I must've been in a bad mood when I wrote that. I did retract it straight away, in my defence, but it is still out there. But why does it have to be related to the 20D? My images are all at home. They are not digital I'm afraid. This is an 'equipment' NG so I suppose I could be forgiven for expecting an equipment discussion instead of "hey look at my pictures!". But I got over it and retracted it. > My images are all at home. They are not digital I'm afraid. This is an > 'equipment' NG so I suppose I could be forgiven for expecting an equipment > discussion instead of "hey look at my pictures!". Arguments are more convincing if illustrated. >> 'This stuff'? name anybody else whose images are consistently as good >> as Bret puts up - and he was posting here before the digital groups [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > 'equipment' NG so I suppose I could be forgiven for expecting an > equipment discussion instead of "hey look at my pictures!". Well, there's plenty of technical discussion on equipment topics, and personally I consider that since the end result of equipment is images, they are on topic (and as digital cameras are mostly evolutions of 35mm film cameras, and use the same lenses, they fit into this equipment group as well). > But I got over it and retracted it. OK, Richard, kudos for your honest reply. Few on the groups have the guts to do that. I have to confess that most of my images haven't been on the net either, and I don't have the excuse that they are film, as I shoot 100% digital. I just seem never to get around to setting up on a site like Pbase. But even so, I don't think I could manage the sheer number of good shots that Bret exhibits {:-( Colin D. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com >> I have to confess that most of my images haven't been on the net either, > and I don't have the excuse that they are film, as I shoot 100% digital. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Colin D. Do you have a 20D? Or maybe get the newer model and call yourself Colin 30D. >>> I have to confess that most of my images haven't been on the net either, >> and I don't have the excuse that they are film, as I shoot 100% digital. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Do you have a 20D? Or maybe get the newer model and call yourself Colin > 30D. You're a mind-reader. I currently have a 300D, lusting after a 30D, problem, price here $2,500. Hard to justify to my S.O. My younger brother has just got himself a 5D and 24-105 IS USM L As a surgeon, he uses it to document peoples' guts! What a waste (waist)! Colin 300D. SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.