Hi,
I just bought the old Sigma 105mm macro lens on Ebay (i.e. not the new
DG version) as it was going cheap (doesn't work with EOS digital, and
I'm still a film luddite). It's generally in good condition, though has
obviously seen some use. But I suspect the focus system may be worn and
wanted to check what's normal as I have a few days to consider
returning it.
Two things are bothering me. One is that there's a bit of play on the
focusing ring, and the other is that the autofocus works very slowly
when the ring is pulled down to the 'manual focus' mode, though I'm not
touching it. It works fine when the focus ring is in the autofocus
position, presumably because the mechanism has less friction to
overcome.
Googling around, I found one report of a worn belt inside of the lens
that was slipping and interfering with the autofocus. I wondered
whether my lens might be developing the same problem.
The lens seems to make two different noises whilst focusing. One is a
normal autofocus noise, and the other is a short high frequency buzz. I
presume the short buzzes are some sort of fine-tuning of the focus,
though I don't see the image change. I also considered it might mean
there was a fault with the autofocus, as sometimes when I try to focus
it just makes these noises and doesn't even seem to search for
something to lock on to.
If it's relevant, my camera is an Eos 300 (film).
Very grateful to anyone who can tell me whether I have a problem lens.
Kit Wolf
Fred Anonymous - 08 Nov 2006 18:52 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> Kit Wolf
Hi Kit.
Oh - Sigma warn users not to have the focuissing ring in Manual mode while
using autofocus.
That can cause undue damage to the focussing mechanism.
I compared that lens with a Canon 100f2.8 macro. The Sigma really was slow
in comparison with the Canon lens. It also hunted in and out of focus more
than the Canon lens.
I must admit that I tend to use manual focus when taking macro pictures.
Regards, Ian.
kit - 10 Nov 2006 18:04 GMT
Hi,
Thanks for your reply Fred. I didn't get a manual with the lens, so I
didn't know you weren't meant to leave the focus ring in manual mode
whilst using autofocus. Knowing that, I guess my lens must be working
properly and I'll keep it.
It puzzles me as to why they added a manual/focus switch as well. If
they'd used the focus ring to switch in and out of manual mode that
would have been quite neat and would have avoided any possibility of
causing damage, but as it is you have to do 2 things to change modes
which seems plain silly.
I liked the Canon too, but couldn't find one 2nd hand. I agree about
manual focus, but it annoys me when things don't work.
Thanks again,
Kit
Fred Anonymous - 10 Nov 2006 19:01 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Kit
Hello again Kit.
I wonder if the "two switch" thing to set auto or manual focus is becuase
Sigma try to make one basic lens design adaptable over several different
mounts/
My girlfriend and I each had one of the lenses so we could directly compare
Sigma and Canon. I sold my Sigma (and now she's bought the EF-S 60mm macro I
have bought the Canon100mm macro from her).
Regards, Ian.