 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / November 2006ANNI'S FIRST RULE OF COMPOSITION !
1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 I thought Darth Vader was dead. I guess not.Evil is still present in the form of, guess who .........? >> 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the >> foreground. >> >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > I thought Darth Vader was dead. I guess not.Evil is still present in > the form of, guess who .........? The Playboy Bunny? > >> 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the > >> foreground. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > The Playboy Bunny? No, the one and only, BRET! > Annika1980 wrote: > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 Damn! I was expecting cheerleaders. > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 Lol, cute pic. The colors are very vivid and striking. What's the second rule of composition? >> 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. >> >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > > Lol, cute pic. The colors are very vivid and striking. > What's the second rule of composition? Bret's second rule: Boobs and Butts do not require any particular framing to be shot-worthy...  SignatureImages (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at: www.pbase.com/markuson > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 Damn! - I thought there might be some cheer leaders in the foreground....... > > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > > > Damn! - I thought there might be some cheer leaders in the foreground....... Okay...Okay....here is your cheerleaders: http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytusk.jpg >> > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. >> > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Okay...Okay....here is your cheerleaders: > http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytusk.jpg LOL! - Uhhhhh....that's not exactly what I had in mind....... > >> > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > >> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > LOL! - Uhhhhh....that's not exactly what I had in mind....... Lol.........sorry Bill. I was joking and decided to remove it, but you saw it. I know exactly what you want. ;^) >>> 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Okay...Okay....here is your cheerleaders: > http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytusk.jpg BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! SignatureImages (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at: www.pbase.com/markuson > >>> 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > >>> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at: > www.pbase.com/markuson I have to agree with ya Mark. I've seen better looking male cheerleaders..............a LOT better looking! I was being a bit too playful last night.....sorry about that. Now, if it were Hugh Jackman.........well, THAT'S different! lol. Helen > http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytusk.jpg Very popular amongst some evengelical pastors and congresscritters... they'd love to "save" these boys, I'm sure... >> http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytusk.jpg > >Very popular amongst some evengelical pastors and congresscritters... >they'd love to "save" these boys, I'm sure... Our prez was a cheerleader at Yale, don't forget. <http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2004/10/1703988.php> rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com > Our prez was a cheerleader at Yale, don't forget. figure he lost at limp biscuit? >> > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the >> > foreground. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > http://www.usc.edu/student-affairs/IMREC/spirit/yell/media/1998rallytus > k.jpg All right, I've been silent for a while, but comes a time... We can cope with your enthusing over Bret, for the most part, and god knows he needs his desperate insecurity boosted. But try something like this again, and the pack of us will cause your ISP to revoke your posting privileges due to inappropriate use policies. Cheerleaders are bumpy, NOT lumpy, and curvy, NOT swishy! Remember this. Five o'clock shadows are a distinct no-no. I'm being nice, this time. ;-) - Al. SignatureTo reply, insert dash in address to match domain below Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net > >> > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the > >> > foreground. [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below > Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net Hummmm, when the tables are turned it's a whole different story! Us gals have our needs too! The pic is good for a laugh anyways. :^) Helen > Hummmm, when the tables are turned it's a whole different story! > Us gals have our needs too! The pic is good for a laugh anyways. :^) > Helen Not fair! Pic was 404 by time I read this thread. No biggie, tho, got to see our Prez's HS and University cheerleading pix. And, it's "We gals", Or "they gave us gals a chance to be cheerleaders". == jmcw >1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 <grin> Classic mistake. The best example I've ever seen was in an expensive fashion magazine, where the photographer had obviously gone to a heap of trouble to set up a tripod on the peak of a ridge to shoot a house on the peak of the next ridge over. He caught it beautifully lit by the dawn light - too bad about the enormous shadow of him & his tripod projected clearly onto one end of the house, & on the ridge under it. It was /just/ soft-edged enough that it wasn't totally obvious at first glance, but as soon as I noticed the overall shape, it stuck out like dogs balls. SignatureW . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- >>1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. >> >>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > > <grin> Classic mistake. Methinks it was very deliberate. With film, few would waste the shot, with digital ... who cares!! > The best example I've ever seen was in an expensive fashion magazine, > where the photographer had obviously gone to a heap of trouble to set [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > soft-edged enough that it wasn't totally obvious at first glance, but > as soon as I noticed the overall shape, it stuck out like dogs balls. You've got it all wrong, that's "performance photography" where the photographer makes himself part of the image... Cheers, Alan Signature-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. >>>1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Methinks it was very deliberate. With film, few would waste the shot, >with digital ... who cares!! Well, we all know that Brett is an exhibitionist. ;) >> The best example I've ever seen was in an expensive fashion magazine, >> where the photographer had obviously gone to a heap of trouble to set [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >You've got it all wrong, that's "performance photography" where the >photographer makes himself part of the image... I'm sure that that's the excuse the photographer used. SignatureW . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est ---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------- > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 I expected a cheerleader (or two, or...). > > 1. Watch out for those pesky distracting elements in the foreground. > > > > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/69662743 > > I expected a cheerleader (or two, or...). I was part of the squad during my days of academia. And I can honestly say NO thank you. Helen |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.