Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

FS: Nikon 70-200mm VR Lens (Toronto Area)

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BasilForty - 22 Oct 2006 22:39 GMT
Mint Condition
$1500 CDN - No Tax

Henry's want $2050 + taxes for this lens

I also have a like new TC-17E that I used with this camera.

Located just North of Toronto - but can meet up downtown as well.

E-Mail: GG at ParklandConsultants.com
Andrew - 24 Oct 2006 12:52 GMT
Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?

> Mint Condition
> $1500 CDN - No Tax
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> E-Mail: GG at ParklandConsultants.com
Wolfgang Exler - 25 Oct 2006 07:21 GMT
>Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?

this is an VR lens. you need a F5 or F100 or any of the digital SLR cameras
for using this VR feature

Wolfgang
michelo - 25 Oct 2006 14:18 GMT
>>Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Wolfgang

So, it is not good for F1 racing?
William Graham - 25 Oct 2006 20:12 GMT
>>>Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> So, it is not good for F1 racing?

This is probably a joke, but just in case it isn't. I will say that no VR
lens is good for racing....These things stabilize the image due to camera
shake, but have no control whatsoever over the subject motion.....If you are
photographing a sporting event, best to leave your VR lenses at home......
michelo - 25 Oct 2006 20:46 GMT
>>>>Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> are photographing a sporting event, best to leave your VR lenses at
> home......

Yes it was. The guy asked for the lens aperture. I was expecting f/2.8 to be
the answer, but instead he received a list of camera body compatibility!
Sorry, I felt like adding one more unrelated F.

Thanks anyway William.

Michel
William Graham - 25 Oct 2006 21:26 GMT
>>>>>Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Michel

Sure....On checking some of the literature on the Nikkor 80 - 400mm VR, I
found out that it will actually work quite well for formula 1 racing....It
will let you pan horizontally in VR mode, and still compensate for vertical
camera shake......I don't own one of these VR lenses, but I might reconsider
buying one of them.....I do a lot of hand held shooting.....
Rita Ä Berkowitz - 25 Oct 2006 21:59 GMT
> This is probably a joke, but just in case it isn't. I will say that
> no VR lens is good for racing....These things stabilize the image due
> to camera shake, but have no control whatsoever over the subject
> motion.....If you are photographing a sporting event, best to leave
> your VR lenses at home......

Do you think this would be a good time to simply turn VR off?  I mean, since
there is a switch on it.  I leave my VR off most of the time anyway, so I
think I might be able to use my VR lenses at the races.

Rita
William Graham - 26 Oct 2006 00:59 GMT
>> This is probably a joke, but just in case it isn't. I will say that
>> no VR lens is good for racing....These things stabilize the image due
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there is a switch on it.  I leave my VR off most of the time anyway, so I
> think I might be able to use my VR lenses at the races.

Well, I don't think it will hurt anything....It's just that it might not
help, although, if you pan horizontally while the cars are going by, the VR
will help with vertical shake, so you should probably leave it on......I
only object to ads like the one in the last KEH catalog I got, where they
say the lens is good for three extra stops, and so you can use it for
sporting events.....This implies that it will compensate for subject motion,
and it won't do that....It will only compensate for camera shake. So, if you
are accustomed to using shutter speed to stop motion of moving subjects, you
will still have to do that, and not be suckered into thinking that those,
"three extra stops" are going to do this for you.
BasilForty - 04 Nov 2006 07:06 GMT
I didn't think that Nikon had a 70-200mm F/4 VR lens so I didn't bother
with the aperture info.  It's definitely a f/2.8 lens.

Thanks,
Jonathan

> Is this an F4 or F2 Lens?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > E-Mail: GG at ParklandConsultants.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.