Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / October 2006
(October, 16th) Picture of the Week
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Daniel Rocha - 17 Oct 2006 05:43 GMT Hello,
Here it is the new picture of the week in b&w
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
Regards,
-- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com
helensilverburg@hotmail.com - 17 Oct 2006 07:32 GMT > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Bienvenue Daniel!!
Wonderful composition, great exposure. I bet it was very hard not to get your reflection in the subject. It's a great pic! Helen
daniel.rocha@free.fr - 17 Oct 2006 12:55 GMT helensilverburg@hotmail.com a écrit :
Hello Helen,
> Bienvenue Daniel!! Thanks :)
> Wonderful composition, great exposure. I bet it was very hard not to > get your reflection in the subject. It's a great pic! > Helen Thanks. But, You can see me on the balls. It's a wish ! :)
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
 Signature <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com
helensilverburg@hotmail.com - 17 Oct 2006 13:06 GMT > helensilverburg@hotmail.com a écrit : > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Not to worry............it's still a great pic! I love it!
Draco - 17 Oct 2006 17:59 GMT > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Good capture. Most folk would just walk by and not see the photo.
Good to see you back.
Draco
Getting even isn't good enough.
Annika1980 - 17 Oct 2006 20:37 GMT > Hello, > > Here it is the new picture of the week in b&w > > http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/ Someone needs to wash your balls. I think I would've Photoshopped myself out of it. And even though the color seems to be a bit off in this one, I like it.
Draco - 17 Oct 2006 21:07 GMT > > Hello, > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I think I would've Photoshopped myself out of it. > And even though the color seems to be a bit off in this one, I like it. Daniel, You got a first. Annika1980 liked it.
WOW!! Good going.
Draco
Getting even isn't good enough.
Mark² - 18 Oct 2006 06:04 GMT >>> Hello, >>> [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Getting even isn't good enough. Nah...he just got Annika wishing he could wash his balls a bit...
:)
 Signature Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at: www.pbase.com/markuson
Daniel Rocha - 18 Oct 2006 10:10 GMT > http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/ > Daniel, You got a first. Annika1980 liked it. Are you sure ?! :)
 Signature <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com
helensilverburg@hotmail.com - 17 Oct 2006 21:09 GMT > > Hello, > > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > I think I would've Photoshopped myself out of it. > And even though the color seems to be a bit off in this one, I like it. LOL....
I was going to suggest Photoshop, but I'm not familiar with it. Wow, it can even remove relections like in the above pic? I'm impressed. Helen
William Graham - 17 Oct 2006 21:33 GMT >> > Hello, >> > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > it can even remove relections like in the above pic? I'm impressed. > Helen It's a great program, and it's amazing what it can do.....I have only scratched the surface, but removing unwanted items from the picture is duck soup......It enables you to take a sample of the picture from somewhere else, (usually nearby) and place it over the offending item.....For example, I found a pop bottle resting against the curb in one of my photos that I didn't notice when I took the picture, and with Photoshop, I was able to take samples of the curb nearby, and place them over the pop bottle, until the bottle was gone.....In a few minutes, you can "clean up" an area such as litter on a lawn or rug, or dirt and mould specks in an otherwise clear sky.....I frequently clean up streets and lawns in a few minutes time that would take a janitor over an hour.....It's kind of like having your own personal janitor/street sweeper along with you on photoshoots....:^) - Of course, it requires digitizing your stuff....Putting it into your computer so the program can work on it......
helensilverburg@hotmail.com - 17 Oct 2006 21:58 GMT > >> > Hello, > >> > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > course, it requires digitizing your stuff....Putting it into your computer > so the program can work on it...... Holy Smokes!! That's amazing Bill! I've got pics with unwanted distractions in them, and it ruins what could be a great pic. I've got one pic where, I never noticed when I was taking it, a transvestite is in the corner wearing a bikini with his genitals hanging out! It's right smack in the corner of the pic. I don't know why I never noticed it, I guess I was so into the scenery at the beach. This was years ago. Anyways, I am interested in Photoshop, but nothing too complicated. Which one do you suggest Bill? Thanks for the advice!! :^) Helen
TheDave© - 17 Oct 2006 22:40 GMT > William Graham wrote: > It's a great program, and it's amazing what it can do.....I have only [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > stuff....Putting it into your computer so the program can work on > it...... It's amazing the stuff you don't notice at the moment that you see later that make you go "DOH!!!".
William Graham - 18 Oct 2006 03:12 GMT >> William Graham wrote: >> It's a great program, and it's amazing what it can do.....I have only [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > It's amazing the stuff you don't notice at the moment that you see > later that make you go "DOH!!!". Yeah....But one of my books about the program said that if you look too close...(blow it up too far) you will continue to see more and more correctable stuff, until you find yourself rearranging things on a pixel to pixel basis.....IOW, you have to use some common sense, and know where to stop, and just accept that you can't make a "perfect picture" with it.....I try to eliminate the big dirt specks but not go below stuff that's 4 or 5 pixels in size........
TheDave© - 18 Oct 2006 05:37 GMT > William Graham wrote: > > "TheDave)" <no@no.com> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > "perfect picture" with it.....I try to eliminate the big dirt specks > but not go below stuff that's 4 or 5 pixels in size........ LOL. I understand what you mean, but I meant stuff like the pop bottle resting against the curb... I've done that, too. Not notice something like that when I take the picture, then it screams out at you when you view it later.
William Graham - 18 Oct 2006 06:08 GMT >> William Graham wrote: >> > "TheDave)" <no@no.com> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > like that when I take the picture, then it screams out at you when you > view it later. Yes....And tissues and paper cups on lawns and the like.....I have to confess though, sometimes I remove legitimate objects. Especially if they are distracting to the overall picture....I commonly wipe out poor birds, whose only offence was to happen to be in an otherwise clear & uncluttered sky, and to be too far away to be clearly identified as birds.....
Annika1980 - 17 Oct 2006 23:58 GMT > I was going to suggest Photoshop, but I'm not familiar with it. Wow, > it can even remove relections like in the above pic? I'm impressed. Here's a quickie Photoshopped version:
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/68750413
Sorry, Danny Boy!
helensilverburg@hotmail.com - 18 Oct 2006 00:15 GMT > > I was going to suggest Photoshop, but I'm not familiar with it. Wow, > > it can even remove relections like in the above pic? I'm impressed. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Sorry, Danny Boy! Is that Spike I see?! What the heck are you doing in Paris?! LOL :^)
I am blown-away at the magic one can do with Photoshop. Great clean-up job Bret. Helen
John McWilliams - 18 Oct 2006 03:33 GMT >> I was going to suggest Photoshop, but I'm not familiar with it. Wow, >> it can even remove relections like in the above pic? I'm impressed. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Sorry, Danny Boy! The cruelest layer of all....
<s>
 Signature john mcwilliams
Daniel Rocha - 18 Oct 2006 10:12 GMT > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/68750413 > Sorry, Danny Boy!
:)
 Signature <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com
Richard Polhill - 18 Oct 2006 08:38 GMT "Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in news:1161113863.266411.130860 @f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com:
> Someone needs to wash your balls. > I think I would've Photoshopped myself out of it. > And even though the color seems to be a bit off in this one, I like it. Perhaps, but then this forum is about 35mm photographic equipment, not using a computer. I'm sure you may find an Adobe group somewhere if that's your thing. :-P
|
|
|