Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / October 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Nikon F90x and  Architectural photography

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Francis Mallon - 16 Oct 2006 04:18 GMT
Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible lens without
spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.
Toby - 16 Oct 2006 12:53 GMT
I think you need to have a look at one of the PC Nikkors (perspective
correction)--which allow you to keep straight lines from converging. For
interiors it is a different story, as the widest PC is (IIRC) 28mm.

Toby

> Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible lens
> without spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.
jeremy - 16 Oct 2006 19:56 GMT
>I think you need to have a look at one of the PC Nikkors (perspective
>correction)--which allow you to keep straight lines from converging. For
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>> Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible lens
>> without spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.

Paint Shop Pro 10 and 11 both have easy-to use perspective correction tools.
They meet my needs just fine--and they work with ANY lens of any focal
length.  The OP might download the 30-day trial from the Corel web site and
see if this might be an acceptable alternative to spending $500 for a lens.
PSP XI is selling at numerous places for under $100.00, and it can also be
used to correct photos that have been taken previously with non-PC lenses.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 16 Oct 2006 15:25 GMT
> Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible lens
> without spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.

A 4x5 or 8x10 camera is needed to take the best possible lens...
check out rec.photo.equipment.large-format.

If you want to keep using 35mm then a PC Nikkor.  An older
35mm [chrome knob] can be found for $200-400, a newer 35mm
[black knob] for $300-500, and a 28mm for $500-$800.  Search
Google for PC Nikkor's to get the pros and cons of the
variations.

If you are taking pictures of houses or from farish away
then a 35mm is OK.  Some very cheap ones are available
as a lot have seen hard use banging around in the trunk
of a real-estate agent's car with the tire wrench.

If it were me I would hold out for a 28mm, much better if
larger buildings and interiors are on the venue.  For NYC
canyonland you will need a view camera if you want
straight verticals.  Decent results can sometimes be
achieved by taking pictures from farther away and then
enlarging only the central/upper portion of the negative.

If the photos are going into PhotoShop, and 4x6" is the output,
then PS has a perspective control feature.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation
http://www.nolindan.com/da/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com

Frank ess - 16 Oct 2006 20:05 GMT
>> Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible
>> lens
>> without spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.
>
> A 4x5 or 8x10 camera is needed to take the best possible lens...
> check out rec.photo.equipment.large-format.

<snip other useful information/advice>

> If the photos are going into PhotoShop, and 4x6" is the output,
> then PS has a perspective control feature.

Speaking of small output
(and not much use to an
Under $500 investment-seeker):

I just did a project of four homes for a tri-fold brochure. I had new
kit to try out, so although the end product was a set of files
suitable for 8x10 prints and whatever the brochure-maker decided to do
with them, it seemed like a good occasion to go through the whole
(learning) rigamarole.

Equipment:
Canon 5D on a Manfrotto 3275 head on a Manfrotto 055MF3 tripod;
Canon 17-40mm F/4.0L USM
Vague ideas about how to shoot a glamorous house picture

The lady of the example house was delighted; please see it and
comment:
http://www.fototime.com/inv/1C81B462C8CF90A

If nothing else, the exhibit will give the enquirer an idea of what a
simple Photo Shop user can achieve with little skill, training, or
expertise.

Signature

Frank ess

Jim - 17 Oct 2006 01:08 GMT
> Could anyone suggest what would be considered the best possible lens
> without spending over 500$ for  Architectural Photography.

Almost any wide angle lens can make such photos.  Use software to correct
the converging lines.

As for which one, that is you job.

Jim
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.