Here's what I thought about the Chrome pictures. I was surprised not
to see a picture of a box of slide film, maybe in a miniature coffin.
Doug Payne
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/chrome
I'm always amazed that people can actually take pictures like this
with the lighting so perfect. I've never learned about lighting. Even
though these mechanical type pictures don't do much for me, I like
this one because the curvature makes me feel like the engine behind
the grill is just ready to go, and go fast. The red(s) are a nice
break from the black and silver. Nice pic.
Rich Pos
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586656
LOL Heads are so interesting, and we never get to see them. The
picture captures all the details from the tiny bumps to the big
craters. It makes you wonder what is going on under the skin. Why
isn't it smooth? The blown out patch is fine for me. I like the dark
ears, too. They are like symmetric anchors to the frame.
Jim Kramer
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586663
This has a striking set of colors, and a really cool chrome look. I
was frustrated by the soft focus on the shiny forehead. I would have
preferred that to be in focus rather than the eyes.
Mardon Erbland
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586924
Another amazing perfectly illuminated mechanical shot. Your statement
about being in the photo made me go back and look for you. Wherever
you are, it doesn't detract. I like all the different angles of the
scene in the different lug nuts. Very chromy. Nice pic.
Quercus
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586931
When I first looked at this I thought it must be some new fancy
mountain bike. This one makes me want to have arrows pointing to the
various parts that explain what all the levers and dials do. It's not
at all like the bow I made for myself when I was 8. I, too, think it
would have been better with a narrower DOF, but I know well what you
mean about forgetting. I still screw up the settings on my D70. You
know, with my old FE I couldn't even change the ISO.
Duncan Chesley
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586959
This might have been better if the cat had decided to stick around for
a few more minutes.
Bowser
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67589560
I like the red with the chrome. And I like all the reflections. But
your reflection bothered me. I like the picture even more flipped
upside down. It makes your reflection right side up, which is less
distracting, and makes the horn point upwards. Flipping it adds that
bit of unexpected strangeness that I'm always fond of.
Ken Nadvornick
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67594765
Nice symmetry and nice lighting. If it was my engine I'd be sorely
tempted to paint an eyeball on the air filter. It makes me remember
that the world is full of people who do weird things with their money.
Unlike me, of course.
Cheers,
DuncanC
That_Rich - 28 Sep 2006 03:19 GMT
>Rich Pos
>http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586656
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>isn't it smooth? The blown out patch is fine for me. I like the dark
>ears, too. They are like symmetric anchors to the frame.
Hey Duncan,
Thanks for your time to review.
The tiny bump / crevices / gashes are (I think) mostly form motorcycle
mishaps... Chad (the model) his brother Aaron and pal Mike are part of
a motorcycle "stunt" team called the WhackPak. Most of the
imperfections are likely attributed to these motoring endeavors with a
bit of genetics thrown in.
Here is a video of the WhackPak in action....
http://www.teamx-treem.net/Video/whackpak.wmv
If you watch long enough you will get a nice view of the back of Chads
head to prove I did NO photoshopping.
Cheers,
RP©
Duncan Chesley - 28 Sep 2006 09:23 GMT
>Here is a video of the WhackPak in action....
Rich,
Thanks for that! You'll have an easy time with the next mandate since
you already have a model. In addition to the head craters Chad must
have a lot of bone fractals! Oh. Wait a minute...
Cheers,
DuncanC
Mardon - 28 Sep 2006 10:33 GMT
Duncan Chesley <BioColor@aol.com> wrote:
> Mardon Erbland
> http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586924
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> different angles of the scene in the different lug nuts. Very
> chromy. Nice pic.
Nice job with the reviews Duncan. I wish I could deliver
constructive criticism with as much tact and empathy as you. Thanks
for doing this. The few times there's been an SI without reviews it
just isn't the same.
Thanks for the "Very chromy" comment. My approach to SI is to put
mandate 1st and art second. Obviously, both are nice but if only one
is possible, I go for meeting the mandate. Sounds like I did with
this one. I also understand why "mechanical shots" are not appealing
to everyone but I like them. Perhaps it's because I'm an engineer.
Guess it shoes. My reflection can be seen on the flat face of the
lug nut located at the 7 o'clock position. Even the camera lens is
clearly visible. Well, "clearly visible" to me; obviously not to
everyone. Next time I'll keep my 'little secrets' to myself. :)
Duncan Chesley - 28 Sep 2006 16:49 GMT
>Here's what I thought about the Chrome pictures. I was surprised not
>to see a picture of a box of slide film, maybe in a miniature coffin.
Katarina Pantelic
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67664144
Welcome to SI. I hope you like feedback.
I love all the greens. Why won't my camera do nice greens? Are those
metallic bugs harder to squish?
I like the sense of 3-D around the left bug. It feels like, under all
that armor, it is contemplating a leap or a flight. To emphasize that
I think I would have cropped tighter on the left bug. Maybe cut off
the right 35%, including the other bug, and the bottom 25% from the
pic.
Cheers,
DuncanC