> Caught this loud creature today:
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64333661
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336445
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336448
Where'd ya get the 1.2?

Signature
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
www.pbase.com/markuson
Annika1980 - 31 Jul 2006 04:38 GMT
> Where'd ya get the 1.2?
www.rentglass.com
Annika1980 - 31 Jul 2006 04:43 GMT
> > Where'd ya get the 1.2?
>
> www.rentglass.com
Oops, what I meant to say is, "I OWN IT!"
Yeah, that's the ticket! I also own a 1DsMKII and a 1200 f/5.6L.
In fact, I have 100 of them! If you don't believe me, you can ask my
wife, Morgan Fairchild! We have two children ... Douglas & McDonald.
They were named after a famous liar. Can you guess who?
Mark² - 31 Jul 2006 05:13 GMT
>>> Where'd ya get the 1.2?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> wife, Morgan Fairchild! We have two children ... Douglas & McDonald.
> They were named after a famous liar. Can you guess who?
Does he shoot pelicans for calendars, and sell them to millions of adoring
fans?
Ya, that's the ticket!
That lens looks like a giant eye-ball...

Signature
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by Mark² at:
www.pbase.com/markuson
John McWilliams - 31 Jul 2006 06:25 GMT
>>> Where'd ya get the 1.2?
>> www.rentglass.com
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> wife, Morgan Fairchild! We have two children ... Douglas & McDonald.
> They were named after a famous liar. Can you guess who?
We've got enough Tommy Finaglins here already yet!
<Pretty soon the ref to Ms. Fairchild will really be dated....>
--
John McWilliams
Help stamp out gratuitous apostrophe's and exclamation point's!!!
> Caught this loud creature today:
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64333661
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336445
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336448
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64333661
the way you have caught this little plant-sucking bug is timeless! He
actually looks cute, with his big eye looking at your lens probably
thinking "I thought I had big eyes". lol
"Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in news:1154303097.238703.239660
@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> Caught this loud creature today:
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64333661
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336445
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/64336448
A few years back, working weddings with an established
"professional" in Florida, he insisted I use his 85mm 1.8 soft-focus lens
for a couple of weddings in low light.
I actually have a shot in a low-lit church, bride and groom coming
back up the aisle after the ceremony and grabbing a quick kiss - they're
side by side, the bride's shoulder just behind the groom's. And he's in
focus while she isn't. So much for fast lenses.
Lost several shots in a small church when I couldn't position
myself where the fixed focal length would be useful. Did a few other
shots using the soft-focus option, only to have the other photographer
toss them because they were, you guessed it, "soft". I handed the lens
back to him with a curt "Thanks but no thanks", and he suggested I keep
it to try the soft-focus option ;-).
You know how much I enjoyed telling him he could fish them out of
the trash if he really wanted, but I would otherwise stick with lenses
that could do the job. Wasn't much for listening to fixed-focal-length
folklore *before* that, and much worse now...
- Al.

Signature
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net