Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Found On A Photo Web Site

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
jeremy - 28 Jul 2006 02:50 GMT
I had never heard of this before.  What do you think?

"HOT TIP OF THE DAY: The numbers and brand name you see on the edge of
developed film were put there by the film maker.  If those letters and
numbers are not solid black ... the film was not developed properly.  If the
characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And, if
they are VERY black, the film was over-developed."
Bob Hickey - 28 Jul 2006 04:31 GMT
> I had never heard of this before.  What do you think?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>                             Nah; I don't believe that. Some just have #s,
some bar codes, some names, and every shade of grey. Some are thin, some
thick, some heavy base fog, some clear, and there are a lot of developers
for every film.      Bob Hickey
Advocate - 28 Jul 2006 04:58 GMT
>> characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And,
>> if
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> thick, some heavy base fog, some clear, and there are a lot of developers
> for every film.      Bob Hickey

I'm not sure I can distinguish between black and very black...Unless my
understanding of the term black is incorrect, are there stages of "black"?
Dave E - 28 Jul 2006 13:43 GMT
>>> characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And,
>>> if
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I'm not sure I can distinguish between black and very black...Unless my
> understanding of the term black is incorrect, are there stages of "black"?

Mate, I'm about to buy an Epson 7800 - there you have:

- Photo Black
- Matt Black
- Light Black
- Light Light Black

So clearly Epson seems to think so.

:-)

(If you buy the Imageprint RIP with it, you also have Phatte Black).
Advocate - 28 Jul 2006 15:23 GMT
> (If you buy the Imageprint RIP with it, you also have Phatte Black).

I've found myself attracted to Phatt Black that I've seen on the BET and MTV
networks
wgreb - 31 Jul 2006 22:28 GMT
Dave,

Donnot forget that after changing to Phatte you will not be able to
print with the Epson driver with normal results. You must use PTAPP.
PTAPP does not support all printer features like the epson driver does.
For Instance: no borderless prints, no user defined papers, no document
controlled settings (Big problem to print with Indesign),
Margins problems with InDesign, Adobe Acrobat, Photoshop and Lightroom.
I do have big big problems with it.

Stuck to just ImagePrint for this it is great for images.

wgreb

Dave E schreef:

> >>> characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And,
> >>> if
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> (If you buy the Imageprint RIP with it, you also have Phatte Black).
wgreb - 31 Jul 2006 22:28 GMT
Dave,

Donnot forget that after changing to Phatte you will not be able to
print with the Epson driver with normal results. You must use PTAPP.
PTAPP does not support all printer features like the epson driver does.
For Instance: no borderless prints, no user defined papers, no document
controlled settings (Big problem to print with Indesign),
Margins problems with InDesign, Adobe Acrobat, Photoshop and Lightroom.
I do have big big problems with it.

Stuck to just ImagePrint for this it is great for images.

wgreb

Dave E schreef:

> >>> characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And,
> >>> if
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> (If you buy the Imageprint RIP with it, you also have Phatte Black).
ColinD - 28 Jul 2006 09:30 GMT
> I had never heard of this before.  What do you think?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> characters are lighter  - grayish - the film was under-developed.  And, if
> they are VERY black, the film was over-developed."

That's right, a very old way of estimating the degree of development,
well-known to photogs who processed their own films.  Similar edge
markings are on 120 films as well, and on flat films - 5x4 etc.

Colin D.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.