Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945. Comments?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Pete@nospam.com - 20 Jun 2005 09:10 GMT

I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
It seems to have great power in its simplicity of operation.
-Pete

Reply to this Message

imbsysop - 20 Jun 2005 11:00 GMT

>I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
>Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
>It seems to have great power in its simplicity of operation.

www.hp945.com ??

Reply to this Message

Pete - 20 Jun 2005 17:49 GMT

> >I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
> >Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
> >It seems to have great power in its simplicity of operation.
>
> www.hp945.com ??

Thanks! (I had never heard of this group.)

Reply to this Message

imbsysop - 21 Jun 2005 10:04 GMT

>> >I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
>> >Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>Thanks! (I had never heard of this group.)

no problem .. I've been in the running for an HP945 for a while 'cos I
have a c912 that I like very much and my freind had a 945 so ..
finally decided for a Canon G6 ..

Reply to this Message

Pete - 24 Jun 2005 16:02 GMT

> >> >I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
> >> >Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> have a c912 that I like very much and my freind had a 945 so ..
> finally decided for a Canon G6 ..

Funny. Consumer reports lists 60 shots as the maximum for the 945 on a set
of batteries. I got 130, and many of them were with flash and movies! I use
NiMH rechargables.
-Pete

Reply to this Message

imbsysop - 27 Jun 2005 09:01 GMT

>> >> >I just bought a Hewlett Packard Photosmart 945 ($249).
>> >> >Does anyone else own this camera? Comments?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>of batteries. I got 130, and many of them were with flash and movies! I use
>NiMH rechargables.

That would surprise me very much .. maybe they speak about alkalines ?
With my HP912 I could easily get between 150-200 shots on one NiMH
charge and the 912 was known to be extremely power "hungry" .. but
then I never had to use the LCD because of the outstanding TTL
viewfinder .. wish they made P&S cams with this type of viewfinder
these days instead of that stupid little piece of optical "magnifying
glass" :-)

Reply to this Message