Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fuji FinePix S5100 Focus problem

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Shagadelic - 12 Jun 2005 22:02 GMT
My question relates to Focus. Everytime I take a picture with anymore
then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus. Zoom is one of the
reasons I bought this camera and have been very disappointed thus far.
I have tried using AF and MF. With a tripod and without. Changing
between AUTO, Portrait, Landscape and Action settings, yet still all
my zoom pictures are out of focus.  My Firmware version is 1.00 Any
suggestions to "clear up" the problem?
Chuck - 13 Jun 2005 04:08 GMT
Repair or replace the camera.
> My question relates to Focus. Everytime I take a picture with anymore
> then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus. Zoom is one of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> my zoom pictures are out of focus.  My Firmware version is 1.00 Any
> suggestions to "clear up" the problem?
Pilbs - 13 Jun 2005 06:49 GMT
> My question relates to Focus. Everytime I take a picture with anymore
> then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus. Zoom is one of the
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> my zoom pictures are out of focus.  My Firmware version is 1.00 Any
> suggestions to "clear up" the problem?

Does the problem still happen if you use a tripod?
Shagadelic - 13 Jun 2005 10:14 GMT
    Yes.

>> My question relates to Focus. Everytime I take a picture with anymore
>> then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus. Zoom is one of the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>Does the problem still happen if you use a tripod?
chrlz@go.com - 16 Jun 2005 06:06 GMT
>Everytime I take a picture with anymore
>then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus.

It is rare for a camera lens to have a fault that would cause shots to
be out of focus as it is zoomed.  And Fuji have a fairly good
reputation for their optics.  It is, however, very common for people to
think they can use long telephoto shots without keeping the camera
*rock* steady - in general terms your shutter speeds should always be
at least as high as the 35mm-focal-length equivalent.  So, if you are
shooting at, say 200mm zoom (which would be about 2/3 of the way
towards the optical zoom limit of that camera), your shutter speed
should be at least 1/200 (or preferably quicker) to avoid camera shake
problems.  Bright daylit shots should be fairly easy, but anything less
may not.  Does increasing the ISO setting help?

Can you post some examples?  Do you know how to recognise the
difference between out-of-focus, and camera shake?  Camera shake has a
directionally 'smeared' effect that looks quite different to o-o-f.

Hence the question about the tripod!  And I still would be questioning
whether it is a camera steadiness problem, or maybe a
'not-giving-the-AF-enough-time' problem, as it may take longer to focus
at long focal lengths or under low-ish light conditions..  Lastly, if
you have eliminated all those, then back to the supplier I guess.
Sorry if you are aware of all of the above, but you haven't given all
that much info to go on.
Shagadelic - 16 Jun 2005 20:35 GMT
    Many thanks for your post.  I got thinking today as I read it
and was fooling around with the shutter speed.  I found that the lever
for the AF/MF also has a push button which actually focused the
pictures.  Zoom pix work great now.  THANKS!

>>Everytime I take a picture with anymore
>>then about 3X zoom my pictures are out of focus.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>Sorry if you are aware of all of the above, but you haven't given all
>that much info to go on.
Dirty Redpool - 19 Jun 2005 02:31 GMT
> Many thanks for your post.  I got thinking today as I read it
> and was fooling around with the shutter speed.  I found that the lever
> for the AF/MF also has a push button which actually focused the
> pictures.  Zoom pix work great now.  THANKS!

Now that you got that problem fixed, what are your opinions on the camera.
I'm considering it as one of my choices for an upcoming camera purchase.
Shagadelic - 19 Jun 2005 16:05 GMT
    This is the third Digi Cam I have owned.  This is the BEST!  I
had upgraded from the HP 735.

>> Many thanks for your post.  I got thinking today as I read it
>> and was fooling around with the shutter speed.  I found that the lever
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Now that you got that problem fixed, what are your opinions on the camera.
>I'm considering it as one of my choices for an upcoming camera purchase.
Dirty Redpool - 20 Jun 2005 09:11 GMT
> This is the third Digi Cam I have owned.  This is the BEST!  I
> had upgraded from the HP 735.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>> camera. I'm considering it as one of my choices for an upcoming
>> camera purchase.

Cool. Tell me more, what fetaures do you find that you enjoy about it in
particular? Do you have sample photos uploaded anywhere?

--
Shagadelic - 20 Jun 2005 20:23 GMT
    I love it's Zoom capability and ease of use.  The menu is very
well laid out and the camera physically is a very nice weight and
shape to hold.  Other then MY initial finger problems with the focus
issue, this is the easiest Digi Cam I have used.  I would highly
recommend it.  I have attached a few pictures from today to this post.
Note the two pictures of the church and the ship in the dry dock
beyond the bridge.  One on near full zoom and one without any zoom.
All pics were taken without a tripod.

>> This is the third Digi Cam I have owned.  This is the BEST!  I
>> had upgraded from the HP 735.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Cool. Tell me more, what fetaures do you find that you enjoy about it in
>particular? Do you have sample photos uploaded anywhere?
Shagadelic - 20 Jun 2005 20:27 GMT
    I love it's Zoom capability and ease of use.  The menu is very
well laid out and the camera physically is a very nice weight and
shape to hold.  Other then MY initial finger problems with the focus
issue, this is the easiest Digi Cam I have used.  I would highly
recommend it.  I have attached a few pictures from today to this post.
Note the two pictures of the church and the ship in the dry dock
beyond the bridge.  One on near full zoom and one without any zoom.
All pics were taken without a tripod.

>> This is the third Digi Cam I have owned.  This is the BEST!  I
>> had upgraded from the HP 735.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Cool. Tell me more, what fetaures do you find that you enjoy about it in
>particular? Do you have sample photos uploaded anywhere?
Shagadelic - 20 Jun 2005 20:31 GMT
    I love it's Zoom capability and ease of use.  The menu is very
well laid out and the camera physically is a very nice weight and
shape to hold.  Other then MY initial finger problems with the focus
issue, this is the easiest Digi Cam I have used.  I would highly
recommend it. If you send me an E-mail I will send you some good demo
pix I took today.

Kevin

san801@NOSPAMsympaticodotca

>> This is the third Digi Cam I have owned.  This is the BEST!  I
>> had upgraded from the HP 735.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Cool. Tell me more, what fetaures do you find that you enjoy about it in
>particular? Do you have sample photos uploaded anywhere?
Dirty Redpool - 21 Jun 2005 08:37 GMT
> I love it's Zoom capability and ease of use.  The menu is very
> well laid out and the camera physically is a very nice weight and
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Kevin

Thanks for the info. I just sent you an email :)

--
Shagadelic - 21 Jun 2005 09:56 GMT
Not received.

>> I love it's Zoom capability and ease of use.  The menu is very
>> well laid out and the camera physically is a very nice weight and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Thanks for the info. I just sent you an email :)
Dirty Redpool - 21 Jun 2005 13:17 GMT
> Not received.

Hmm... it was sent from my crankytheturtleAThotmailDOTcom address. Perhaps
it got nabbed by a filter?
--
Shagadelic - 21 Jun 2005 19:06 GMT
    Not my address.  Send it to:

san801@nsdotsympaticodotca

Change the dot to .

>> Not received.
>
>Hmm... it was sent from my crankytheturtleAThotmailDOTcom address. Perhaps
>it got nabbed by a filter?
Shagadelic - 22 Jun 2005 03:42 GMT
    Sent you the pix.  I just hope Hotmail can handle them all!

>    Not my address.  Send it to:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>Hmm... it was sent from my crankytheturtleAThotmailDOTcom address. Perhaps
>>it got nabbed by a filter?
Dirty Redpool - 22 Jun 2005 12:56 GMT
> Sent you the pix.  I just hope Hotmail can handle them all!

Luckily I have one of the 250 Meg accounts. Thanks very much for the pics :)

--
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.