Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Digital Photography / Digital Photo / June 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Camera as scanner

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Laurence - 06 Jun 2005 11:04 GMT
I do a lot of scanning (mostly text) in libraries etc.It is slow & tedious
with present technology ie hand scanners.I know nothing about cameras but
would nevertheless like to explore the possibilities of just photographing
the pages & later downloading
onto the computer.
Are there any reasons why this is a silly idea?
Any body done this or know any body who has?
Jan - 06 Jun 2005 13:14 GMT
> I do a lot of scanning (mostly text) in libraries etc.It is slow & tedious
> with present technology ie hand scanners.I know nothing about cameras but
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any reasons why this is a silly idea?
> Any body done this or know any body who has?

Would you go home and quicky-print the pictures (like on a laserjet) and
then scan them in?  Might work.

Jan
CSM1 - 06 Jun 2005 16:34 GMT
>I do a lot of scanning (mostly text) in libraries etc.It is slow & tedious
> with present technology ie hand scanners.I know nothing about cameras but
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any reasons why this is a silly idea?
> Any body done this or know any body who has?

The idea has been discussed before.

A 4 megapixel digital camera mounted on a stand to look down on the page
will work. A 4 megapixel image will make a 200 DPI equivalent of a scanner
image. The image size of a 4 megapixel camera is about 2288 x 1712 pixels,
which when printed 8.5 X 11 inches is about 200dpi. If you want higher
resolution in the final image you use a higher resolution camera.
Of course, when viewed on a computer screen the image is huge.

A copy stand with lighting is what is needed.

Here is one at a reasonable price with lights.
http://www.adorama.com/CECS1L.html?searchinfo=copy%20stand&item_no=20

Same stand without lights.
http://www.adorama.com/CECS1.html?searchinfo=copy%20stand&item_no=29

List of copy stands.
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?page=searchresults&searchinfo=copy%20stand

However you must ask the librarian if you can bring in your own equipment.

Signature

CSM1
http://www.carlmcmillan.com
--

Mike Russell - 07 Jun 2005 06:07 GMT
> I do a lot of scanning (mostly text) in libraries etc.It is slow &
> tedious with present technology ie hand scanners.I know nothing about
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Are there any reasons why this is a silly idea?
> Any body done this or know any body who has?

It's not a silly idea at all, it works quite well.  I have photographed the
phone book, sharp corner to corner, with three megapixels, and copied
magazine articles this way.  Very fast and the end result, after some
fiddline in Photoshop, is better quality than a copier..

Depending on the quality needed, you may do this hand-held, with a tripod or
other camera fixture, or with lighting for a really professional job

If the images are destined for OCR, I would be leery of the dimensional
stability being good enough for applications such as OCR.
Signature

Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.